Official Forum Rules! [READ before posting!]

[Mikasa]

This thread wasn't ment to become a place to discuss your personal interests like signatures.

[Voakie]

(05-03-2017, 03:57 PM)Mikasa Wrote: This thread wasn't ment to become a place to discuss your personal interests like signatures.

I can play staubsaug-roboter for you, if you want

[Squirrel]

(05-03-2017, 12:44 PM)nuggz Wrote: Is my signature sexually exciting you?

You consider it porn?

PORN?? 

It's a cartoon

Good job trying to tell on me 

Don't @ me

I'm with Nuggz on this one.

Any "stimulation" that there might be was completely the doing of your brain.

I see a cartoon of a young gal reclining on a couch.

And as for "telling", she's aware of the age of some of the guys, and how their imaginations run on overdrive, any time a decent lookin' gal is involved.

So the right thing to do, if you feel "stimulated" is to go somewhere else, take care of the problem, and most of all...

we don't need to know that you had a problem!

She's spoken for anyhow. Any attempt you would make, would only fail.

~cough~ And this is why 20 yr old gals aren't seen at high school dances.
~teases the male high school goers!~

[Eden]

(05-03-2017, 12:44 PM)nuggz Wrote:

(05-03-2017, 02:05 AM)Eden Wrote: @Mikasa @Sora i have a quick q;
in the rules it says no half-naked women and porn and such, but what about stuff like @"nuggz"'s signature? that looks pretty nsfw but i just wanted to get your guys opinions on it (not trying to cause any trouble @nuggz )

Is my signature sexually exciting you?

You consider it porn?

PORN?? 

It's a cartoon

Good job trying to tell on me 

Don't @ me

freaking hell chill i was just suggesting that, seeing as Agario is a game generally for minors (no offense to our 20yr old + gamers) there would be a lot of eight to eleven year olds getting a little too excited... i can see ur point tho.

this is stupid anyway

[Doigt]

I agree with Eden. The question is pertinent and shouldn't be brushed aside for what amounts to a childish response in general. Now, to what we want to know, is it allowed that a picture in your avatar and/or signature depicts a lady (or gentleman) in a provacative manner as long as it doesn't show naughty bits?

And please, don't argue that @nuggz's sig isn't what it is. Wether it is flesh or cartoon, it is what it is (and you don't need a dirty mind to understand what's going on in this picture)

[Squirrel]

(05-03-2017, 10:49 PM)Doigt Wrote: I agree with Eden. The question is pertinent and shouldn't be brushed aside for what amounts to a childish response in general. Now, to what we want to know, is it allowed that a picture in your avatar and/or signature depicts a lady (or gentleman) in a provacative manner as long as it doesn't show naughty bits?

And please, don't argue that @nuggz's sig isn't what it is. Wether it is flesh or cartoon, it is what it is (and you don't need a dirty mind to understand what's going on in this picture)

You seem very convinced that your opinion (of what the cartoon 'is doing') is the only correct one, but sorry, I don't agree.

In order to do that, we have to say that a single line, 1 pixel wide represenbted the top line of a pair of p[ants, when there is no clear delineated bottom.

I still say that it was your imagination running point.

But guess it doesn't matter now, she's changed it.

[Doigt]

When I read your post, squirrel, I felt like the guy on top of the pole.
 

[Squirrel]

(05-05-2017, 07:23 PM)Doigt Wrote: When I read your post, squirrel, I felt like the guy on top of the pole.
 

This is a completely unfair comparison.

Your latest message provides nothing new.

You interpreted a picture, and attached what you wanted to it.

And I saw how your imagination could go there, but disagreed. Are you really that closed to artistic interpretation?!

Now you're just doing me a disservice.

So, thanks very much. (Not)

[Doigt]

Squirrel, you think I'm being unfair? I'll tell you sincerely, you are making a clown out of yourself on purpose and it's not funny. No one's laughing. Absolutely no one.

The only one doing a disservice to anyone is you who is attacking eden's pertinent question about nudity (and no matter how much of your "artistic interpretation" you do, she is naked). Not only that, but you have very poorly checked your facts:

-> Eden's question was about nudity and is valid wether the girl in the picture is touching herself or not.
-> Nuggz didn't change her signature despite what you said.
-> The console in the picture is an Atari and anyone who has played with Atari Consoles know that their controllers are mostly long cylindrical objects. You can see the cable of the controller leading up to between her legs, so you know that there's a phallic-ish object there, she has her hand there and her pants are down as well. Do you still insist that she's not doing anything with it? It's just hangin' there by the cockpit while the hand is on standby?

Foolish squirrel, you thought you could tease our minds with your obvious dishonesty. Why are you even doing this? The artist who created this picture knew what he was doing, you would have to be either blind or really distracted not to notice the environment she's in. Do you think the ghosts in the picture are reacting to absolutely nothing? Have you ever looked for that picture's title on the internet? No, you didn't, you bullshitted an entire thread with sillyness and thought it was ok.

I'm disappointed squirrel, I thought you were better than this, but I was wrong.

[Eden]

(05-06-2017, 03:12 AM)Squirrel Wrote:

(05-05-2017, 07:23 PM)Doigt Wrote: When I read your post, squirrel, I felt like the guy on top of the pole.
 

This is a completely unfair comparison.

Your latest message provides nothing new.

You interpreted a picture, and attached what you wanted to it.

And I saw how your imagination could go there, but disagreed. Are you really that closed to artistic interpretation?!

Now you're just doing me a disservice.

So, thanks very much. (Not)

okay so you're both overreacting. I'm still siding with doigt because i have seen/played an Atari before and their controllers are... well... like doigt said, long and cylindrical.

other than that u are both freaking out over not a lot. squirrel probably didn't know what Atari controllers look like, therefore its a misunderstanding...

[Valle]

Well, what a lovely conversation on a signature. The rules clearly state no 'half naked positions' what more is there to say? Is it that hard to follow a simple rule?

[Squirrel]

(05-06-2017, 11:34 PM)Eden Wrote: okay so you're both overreacting. I'm still siding with doigt because i have seen/played an Atari before and their controllers are... well... like doigt said, long and cylindrical.

other than that u are both freaking out over not a lot. squirrel probably didn't know what Atari controllers look like, therefore its a misunderstanding...

Atari?!

Atari?!??

Man, there is a name I haven't heard in atleast a decade. I had a friend who had one, and we would play a game for an entire weekend, stopping only to sleep and eat. (His wife sooooo loved those days!) And I non't even remember what they look like. Joystick-like??

It doesn't really matter now, the object of discussion is gonzo. :|

[Demon King]

2 things from the random demon... first what would count as half nude? there are various way to count it as so... but if you would count nuggz as half naked state that directly don't dance around it but I don't care about it she doesn't post all the time and if she does who the hell cares it's a picture that you'll forget unless you focus on it.. which means YOU are making it sexual. Now on to the second one madison is not a girl so it doesn't apply to you ryan. But the no woman abusing thing is stupid because why can you attack us but us not say anything back? I do not agree with that but if you make it one you will ruin a lot of peoples perspective for this website. But those are 2 things that I am saying something about what is half naked and why should woman abusing be something you can be banned for? especially if they say something first!

[Squirrel]

(05-08-2017, 01:41 AM)Demon King Wrote: 2 things from the random demon... first what would count as half nude? there are various way to count it as so... but if you would count nuggz as half naked state that directly don't dance around it but I don't care about it she doesn't post all the time and if she does who the hell cares it's a picture that you'll forget unless you focus on it.. which means YOU are making it sexual. Now on to the second one madison is not a girl so it doesn't apply to you ryan. But the no woman abusing thing is stupid because why can you attack us but us not say anything back? I do not agree with that but if you make it one you will ruin a lot of peoples perspective for this website. But those are 2 things that I am saying something about what is half naked and why should woman abusing be something you can be banned for? especially if they say something first!

"Abuse" can be perpetrated by anyone. So whether you're abusing a guy or a gal doesn't matter... It's common sense to assume that the same rules apply to everyone.

If anything, because this site is sausage-heavy, there's likely to be some people who would tend to jump to the defense of a gal. (I would definitely number as one of those.)

But if I saw a guy getting winged, I would speak out as well.

I'm sure that the "rules" are intended to be evenly applied to everyone.

Nothing else makes any sense at all.

[Demon King]

(05-08-2017, 02:16 AM)Squirrel Wrote:

(05-08-2017, 01:41 AM)Demon King Wrote: 2 things from the random demon... first what would count as half nude? there are various way to count it as so... but if you would count nuggz as half naked state that directly don't dance around it but I don't care about it she doesn't post all the time and if she does who the hell cares it's a picture that you'll forget unless you focus on it.. which means YOU are making it sexual. Now on to the second one madison is not a girl so it doesn't apply to you ryan. But the no woman abusing thing is stupid because why can you attack us but us not say anything back? I do not agree with that but if you make it one you will ruin a lot of peoples perspective for this website. But those are 2 things that I am saying something about what is half naked and why should woman abusing be something you can be banned for? especially if they say something first!

"Abuse" can be perpetrated by anyone. So whether you're abusing a guy or a gal doesn't matter... It's common sense to assume that the same rules apply to everyone.

If anything, because this site is sausage-heavy, there's likely to be some people who would tend to jump to the defense of a gal. (I would definitely number as one of those.)

But if I saw a guy getting winged, I would speak out as well.

I'm sure that the "rules" are intended to be evenly applied to everyone.

Nothing else makes any sense at all.

except you haven't said anything about me getting insulted or talked down upon... so no I do not believe it would apply to both genders because of the way I've seen it happen before I get in a fight with a girl and later I'm yelled at but they get nothing said to them so why should I believe that it change here? and it doesn't matter how many men are on here everyone should be treated equal that's what a fucking feminist is and that's what I believe should happen so I do not believe that a rule should protect only those without "sausages" but everyone and if you see someone getting attacked or insulted you should stick up for them not just attack the male

---

(12-28-2016, 03:00 AM)kekboy pro Wrote:

(12-20-2016, 12:25 AM)TWTDEATH2 Wrote: I like the rules

---

can there be a rule about no women abusing because i have been harrased in this chat

there is already a rule in place that specifically bans harassment so there is no need for a specific rule pertaining to females... in fact, such a rule will most likely have the opposite effect to that which you intend
stop being a thin-skinned whiner, and stop trying to become part of a protected class... it gives women a bad name

kekboy I love you so much