+- Agario Forum | The Online Agar.io Leading Community (http://agarioforums.net)
+-- Forum: Agar.io (http://agarioforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Fun (http://agarioforums.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: United States vs. United Kingdom? (/showthread.php?tid=55364)
United States vs. United Kingdom? - Owl - 04-29-2018
This topic is Purely intended for jokes, not to be taken seriously.
Who do you think would in a battle & Why?
Post your Opinions down below!
![[Image: LbBamk3.png]](http://i.imgur.com/LbBamk3.png)
RE: United States vs. United Kingdom? - Final - 04-30-2018
You must be bored as fuck.
RE: United States vs. United Kingdom? - Owl - 04-30-2018
What is that suppose to mean @Final?
RE: United States vs. United Kingdom? - Squirrel - 04-30-2018
(04-29-2018, 10:32 PM)Owl Wrote:This topic is Purely intended for jokes, not to be taken seriously.
Who do you think would in a battle & Why?
Post your Opinions down below!
This would never happen! (lol)
The two countries are so far away, and on different continents, so they would likely never even get to each other.
These days, the British naval fleet is much smaller than it once was... They have enough to take care of their island, their NATO duties, and maybe a few extra.
If Britain went to the USA, they wouldn't be able to take enough soldiers/equipment....
And if the USA went to the UK, they would still have a hard time, because it is never easy to successfully land forces, and start a beachhead on a well-defended island.
Both countries have sufficient naval aircraft/radar capability to make that next to impossible.
RE: United States vs. United Kingdom? - Shadow Fox - 05-01-2018
(04-30-2018, 04:18 AM)Squirrel Wrote: This would never happen! (lol)
The two countries are so far away, and on different continents, so they would likely never even get to each other.
These days, the British naval fleet is much smaller than it once was... They have enough to take care of their island, their NATO duties, and maybe a few extra.
If Britain went to the USA, they wouldn't be able to take enough soldiers/equipment....
And if the USA went to the UK, they would still have a hard time, because it is never easy to successfully land forces, and start a beachhead on a well-defended island.
Both countries have sufficient naval aircraft/radar capability to make that next to impossible.
Don’t forget that the US has military bases in the UK and all around Europe. There’s also a big difference in the number of active aircraft carriers. Besides, our best friend Canada will assist, which will make this battle a no contest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/cq8qwbRUWruRG/giphy.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/RAGUpYLsOX2Pm/giphy.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/r8AKGSaw7qRRS/giphy.gif)
RE: United States vs. United Kingdom? - Squirrel - 05-01-2018
(05-01-2018, 03:24 AM)Shadow Fox Wrote: Don’t forget that the US has military bases in the UK and all around Europe. There’s also a big difference in the number of active aircraft carriers. Besides, our best friend Canada will assist, which will make this battle a no contest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers
Canada?! LOL, don't make me laugh!!
Canada has two subs.... both used & bought from the UK. They never worked right for the UK, and now that's our 'stealth ship'! It can't make it's way out of a dry dock!!